National Plan for Open Science in 2018, the monitor has been designed
as:
👑 a sovereign and evolving tool for assessing the impacts of the open science
public policy
🔧 a strategic tool to refine and adjust open science public policies
👩🔬 a lever for improving knowledge of French scientific production, beyond the Open Science
aspects
The monitor is a command for
monitoring and steering public policy
by taking into account bibliodiversity
sharing and openness to encourage transparency and reproducibility
🧗 These constraints led us to choose the difficult path
at the methodological level, in particular for detection of
affiliations and disciplinary fields
at the operational level, with a IT infrastructure adapted
Publications
Current situation
#1 Extract data
PubMed, Crossref, HAL
🏗️ Automatic country detection (affiliation-matcher)
#2 Detect the country of affiliations
🏗️ Automatic country detection (affiliation-matcher)
#3 Consolidate the opening status
Open access detection: Unpaywall
🏗️ Classification of open access types
#3 Consolidate the disciplinary classification
Training data : Pascal and Francis, Field of Research (FoR)
🏗️ Automatic classification models (fastText)
#4 Share the results
#4 Share the results
200 local variations
Indicators
Indicators
Data, code and software
#1 Collect data
#2 Download PDFs, the open ones
#2 Download PDFs, the closed ones
#3 Consolidate metadata - Grobid
#3 Consolidate metadata - DataStet & Softcite
#4 Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
... capitalizing on and complementing existing open sources
🏗️ Built at MESR within the FOSM framework
🏛️ Affiliations metadata
PubMed, Crossref, HAL
🏗️ Crawling web pages
🏗️ Automatic country detection (affiliation-matcher)
🔍 Characterization of open access
Open access detection: Unpaywall
🏗️ Classification of open access types
🤖 Thematic classification
Training data : Pascal and Francis, Field of Research (FoR)
🏗️ Automatic classification models (fastText)
A modular approach ...
Comparison with major international databases
Lauranne Chaignon, Daniel Egret; Identifying scientific
publications countrywide and measuring their open access: The case of the French Open Science Monitor (FOSM).
Quantitative Science Studies 2022; 3 (1): 18-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00179
"The open-source strategy used by the FOSM effectively identifies the vast majority of publications with
a persistent identifier (DOI) for Open Science monitoring."
Sensitivity of open access rate measurement (1/3)
Lauranne Chaignon, Daniel Egret; Identifying
scientific
publications countrywide and measuring their open access: The case of the French Open Science Monitor (FOSM).
Quantitative Science Studies 2022; 3 (1): 18-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00179
The OA rate varies according to the source, but the more diversified the source, the lower the sensitivity.
Sensitivity of open access rate measurement (2/3)
The OA rate varies according to the date of observation (which is rarely specified).
Sensitivity of open access rate measurement (3/3)
Numerous dimensions analyzed in the FOSM: discplines, publication type, languages, distribution platform ...
Information-sharing services for a variety of uses
Demultiplier : to provide the means to build a local variation
(establishment, laboratory, etc.) very easily and with the same rendering as the national FOSM (cf. the
FOSM local variation for University of Lorraine)